Narrative Warfare

What do you know about narrative warfare ?twUhFDzP.jpg-large

Marxists use an attack technique I refer to as “narrative warfare.” I characterize narrative warfare as constructing a narrative that is intended to cause a public backlash against a particular group. These narratives are then delivered using a large public platform like media or the education system, so as to cause social eruptions. Narrative warfare is used to agitate the general population, instigate riots and incite violence. It can also be used as a means of weakening an entire society by using perpetual guilt narratives and conditioning its population to be submissive, no longer defend themselves or their way of life and prepare to disappear.

When a group is targeted with narrative warfare, one will notice the steady and continual release of negative narratives from highly visible and influential platforms; these narratives are designed to result in social backlash against the target group.
Even if the narrative is old, told thousands of times already and all sides of the public are tired of hearing it, the Marxists continue to distribute and use it over and over again because it still works, and continues to cause new attacks on their target.

This is usually why there is a fight over who gets to tell the story. The person who controls the narrative has immense power. The words chosen and narrative constructed can be used as a weapon because of how it will cause the population react. This is also the reason the Left guards the public platform with great hostility and tries to block counter narratives by de-platforming, censorship tactics or accusations of “hate speech” so that the narratives they have constructed can not be challenged or invalidated. As long as they control the narrative that is shown to the general population, they control what the population thinks and how they will react to certain situations.

Who uses narrative warfare ?

Narrative warfare is used by individuals and organizations on the left who have contempt for a society and seek different ways to destabilize and destroy that society, its people and their entire way of life, from within. Take Marxists for example, they destroy society by any means necessary and utilize narrative warfare to use the men, women and children of the general population as their disposable weapon. Since Marxists make up a small percentage of the general population, they are unable to win a physical war as they are grossly outnumbered, but they can create and circulate narratives that will get one part of the population to carry out revenge attacks against another part of the population for them, resulting in mutual destruction, and weakening the host nation from within.

These narratives can be made up of false accusations or “hollow circular arguments” and to the general public on the receiving end, these narratives are assumed to be truthful and often treated seriously. Well-intentioned people spend countless hours researching statistics and trends in attempt to document any proof for some of the most wild accusations. But, to the Marxist who made up the argument, it was never about being truthful; it was about accomplishing their goals.
The Marxists real intention is to make up arguments and narratives that will cause one part of the population to react by carrying out retaliation attacks against another part of the population (doing their destructive work them). While we have seen tons of well-meaning citizens in the media pour their heart out or make a large effort to make things right, you’ll notice the Marxists lack true empathy; they act as if nothing will ever be good enough for them and sometimes, you’ll see them enjoy watching the other person toil away, wasting their energy because they are unaware that they have been tricked by nothing more than a cleverly worded argument.


What are some of the platforms used for delivery ?

Uses in Media :

We have all noticed certain manipulation patterns in media reporting over the years.

We have noticed when articles decide to list what color a perpetrator is versus when they will use a euphemism like “teens, youths or protesters” to conceal their identity and motive.

We all notice which stories get reported nationally, and which stories get ignored and how this dependable pattern determines which populations receive public backlash and criticism for their behavior and which populations get a free pass.

We see bogus agitation articles structured to self-justify by using tricky opening remarks like “there are calls for this and that, or anonymous sources say ….” but we’re never told who is making these mysterious “calls“ and have no way to know if the so-called anonymous source actually exists or if it’s a fellow activist sitting at the table next to whom ever wrote the article. This method works well with a deploy and amplify strategy. Certain activist groups who are good at crafting narratives designed to manipulate the population in to conflict hand off to a media platform that’s used to amplify that narrative and instigate a public commotion. They just claim those magic words “anonymous sources say” and they seem to escape accountability. Then they repeat the process.

Consider all these fake “hate crimes” and “staged racism”. An activist group and a media platform partner up using the deploy and amplify strategy knowing it’s the host population who will be automatically suspected by the general public and targeted with the social backlash when, for example, a swastika is randomly painted on a wall somewhere or little string nooses are planted on college campuses. Media shouts the lie on the front page and then whispers the correction a week or two later on the back page somewhere at the bottom, long after the “racial justice” attacks have occurred, and their mission has been completed.

Just think of the large-scale destruction one person is capable of if they were to immigrate to another society, and use a media platform to continually show that population movies or distribute articles that are highly sensitive and agitating to the people there. Research their history, revive old forgotten tensions or past wrongs between various groups and produce articles that will manipulate those groups in to conflict. If you want to destroy the nation from within, circulate articles that will urge splinter groups in the population to unite and carry out joint retaliation attacks against the main host population. Run article after article packed with Marxist-style arguments making up any random reason you can think of to vandalize and tear down all of their cultural symbols, ban their national flag, attack traditional values, subvert their immigration system and release weaponized ideologies that will destroy their family structure to stop them from replenishing their population.

This is also a clever means for one ethnic sub-group to carry out indirect attacks against its host nation. Lets say your group makes up a very small percentage of the population there and just happen to hate that society and its people. There is no way you can wage a physical war because you are grossly outnumbered and destined to lose. You can, however, manipulate other portions of the population to carry out some attacks against the host nation for you, and weaken that society from within. Just continually make and release movies and articles that will agitate random disparate groups and cause them to carry out revenge attacks against the host nation. If this is done repeatedly and for a long period of time, you can actually destroy an entire nation by causing it to rot from the inside out. No need for an army or physical forms of warfare, just use “narrative warfare” to circulate false, invented narratives that will continually cause riots and other forms of conflict. This way, you destroy the country from within by using their own men, women and children as your fodder—while keeping your own ethnic group safe in the process.

See how this works ? The agitation agent just needs a large visible platform to deliver the narrative and can enter the society posing as a movie star, late night talk-show host or even a comedian. As long as the platform reaches enough people, the agitation agent can use it to continually deliver the agitation narratives and simply wear the job title of comedian or talk-show host as a beard.

Something to consider when analyzing media. The next time you see someone on television using tactics that agitate the general population or denigrate your cultural symbols, identity, holidays, norms or religion. Research that person’s identity and locate which ethnic sub-group they belong to. See if they subject their own sub-group to the same treatment or if they’re only doing this to other groups. If they protect their own group from these tactics while simultaneously using these tactics on other groups, then you must further question if this was really just comedy or entertainment, or if their TV personality title is just a disguise and their real purpose is to carry out one-sided attacks on your population and weaken your society from within.


Uses in Education:

Do teachers use narrative warfare? Yes, activist teachers can engage in narrative warfare because academic freedom lets them choose which collection of narratives to use and determine the social effect they want to have on their students.

The education platform has been used to create many splinter groups through specialty studies programs ranging from feminism to ethnic studies, all of which are united on a common theme of resenting and degrading the host society, its founding population and their norms.

Ethnic studies programs provide a good example. Most of the lesson plans have been constructed by Marxist teachers who choose a collection of stories that will result in resentment against the host nation. Stories that highlight past partnership or would inspire coexistence and mutual respect are intentionally excluded. It’s easy to prove this is done deliberately because the teacher controls what literature is used and whether or not they want their class to feel resentment towards the host society, and inspire acts of aggression against it. Their real intention is clear, activist teachers use the education platform to condition a part of the general population and create a demographic weapon that can be used to carry out internal attacks. This also explains the decades long use of “one-sided slave narratives”. The real intention was never to teach our population about slavery but to conceal conflicting narratives and only choose a collection of stories meant to radicalize one portion of the population and mobilize it to carry out continuous revenge attacks against the host population.

The collection of stories and narratives used in classrooms are mainly controlled by a group of teachers who combine to make up the “curriculum committee”. Along with the Dean of curriculum, this committee decides which collection of stories will be allowed in the pool of literature teachers can select from to use in their classrooms. This curriculum committee also has the power to ensure that the entire pool of literature that the teachers can select from, only contains narratives that will condition students to feel angry and resentful.

That said, you’ll notice special treatment is given to the groups of students who become agitated from this collection of narratives, and engage in hostile behavior. The teachers encourage these special treatment groups to retaliate and rename their acts of aggression to “justice”. Most special treatment groups are given a free pass from behavioral requirements and discipline which by design, seems to create an atmosphere of perpetual unrest and destabilization on campus.

In addition, there is also an established “campus caste” in which some groups are taught to be critical of other groups, but not the other way around. Special treatment groups are given a platform plus on site training to create and deliver narratives that will cause retaliation against other groups, but the other groups whom are targeted are denied equal training and strictly forbidden from doing the same thing back.

How is such a biased atmosphere allowed? Upon investigation you’ll see most policies and laws function in sync with narrative warfare because they are creatively worded to only provide their protections to the special treatment groups and not provide equal protection to the host population. Since no policies have been written to protect the host population from the attacks carried out by the special treatment groups, the school admin is only required to respond and enforce a system of one-sided surveillance and one-sided behavioral discipline which has resulted in synthetic dominance on campus.

The end result ? The special treatment groups are trained to target others with various forms of harassment and those on the receiving end who do not receive special treatment or protections are unable to get out of striking distance because of the forced association policies currently in place.

My question to you, the reader. Consider the comedians, talk-show hosts or media companies who exhibit the pattern of only discussing topics or reporting stories that will result in retaliation attacks against the host population, or the politicians who use guilt narratives against their own people to force things on them that they would otherwise reject and ask yourself. What sort of public reaction do they deserve to experience once the general population figures out what has been done?


Minority Privilege Checklist

The Minority Privilege system is a class privilege system, not one of race.

This is validated when we limit this analysis to one racial category and point out that some of the subgroups are classified as minority, while other subgroups are not, all contained within the same racial group.

Analyzing further to compare the treatment minority classes receive verses non-minority classes, makes the system of double standards, immunities and special treatment visible. As a “class privilege system” minority classes enjoy the following:

1. Schools will never teach about the awful things my ancestors did or tell me that I must atone for them.

2. The role my ancestors played in the trapping, selling, transport, and owning of slaves will not be taught about in schools nor discussed in media, news articles or movies about slavery.

3. No expectations to apologize on behalf of my group.

4. I’m given a free pass to say or do things that others cannot.

5. My cultural symbols, practices, holidays or norms will never be banned for being “offensive”.

6. My school will use literature that encourages me to take pride in my heritage, ancestry and I will receive positive reinforcement.

7. Policies or laws on discrimination won’t apply to me or stop me from forming segregated organizations and excluding people who are different.

8. I can count on media to use ambiguous terms such as ‘teen’ or ‘youths’ to conceal any criminal deeds done by my group. (Media will only portray a positive image of my group).

9. I can depend on receiving a higher level of sympathy from media.

10. I can depend on media to show more concern for my social image than they will show for my victim.

11. If I commit crime against others, I know that protection laws will function in a one-sided way that offers me more protection than my victim.

12. I can rest assured that the government will not allow the society I occupy to publish or know the true percentage of crime minorities commit against the host population or parent culture.

13. If I target other groups for harassment or attacks, I can rest assured that media will not report it on a national or international level nor use malicious accusations of racial or ethnic motive. Also, SPLC, DOJ or NAACP will not pursue hate-crime charges.

14. I will have an easier time obtaining a platform to criticize others.

15. I enjoy a quota system that guarantees I will receive preferential treatment for school admission, financial resources, and employment opportunities at the expense of others who may be more qualified than me.

16. I am the beneficiary of Affirmative Action policies that deny equity and resources to the host society.

17. I can immigrate to other societies that have a minority class system in place knowing I’ll receive a higher level of special treatment, financial gifts and exemptions compared to other immigrants who are not of minority class.

18. Policies are in place to ensure my interests will be overrepresented in politics, social institutions, and media.

19. Minority Privilege is the reason why no colleges or universities require students to complete coursework on Minority Privilege.

Unsure if Minority Privilege is affecting the outcome of certain situations? Simply switch the roles of the parties involved. Most of the time, you’ll find a double standard present which is due to this class system. Illuminating the Minority Privilege system for others to see starts with naming it, calling it what it is, call it out! Make sure it’s acknowledged and documented each time you encounter it.

How to Detect a Transitist

Identifying the Transitist is made difficult not masked-man.jpgonly because the words needed to do so have been purposely denied to the public but also because there are powerful people who don’t want a term made available that describes heavily guarded and advanced deception techniques. A Transitist is someone who exploits the benefits of using multiple different identities in a transitory way. To serve as a decoy, they strategically misrepresent themselves by claiming national origins or racial categories they do not descend from for the purpose of hiding their real ethnic identity or ancestry. Conforming with identity fraud and used as a decoy, this technique is often used for personal gain, self entitlement, incursion, aiding propaganda, infiltration, misrepresentation and ambushing of targeted groups, deflection of shame, accountability or to camouflage and protect ones heritage by using a false identity when committing horrendous acts, crimes, or while sabotaging other ethnic groups using techniques like hoax-crimes.

Throughout history and up until this point this has been done with stealth and for the most part, not formally addressed while the effects have forever altered what they call  “history” and teach in schools or reference in media today. Identifying this technique is the first step to unlocking the truth and decoding the reasons why the western system chose to use the term of “white” when teaching about the slave trade instead of using the words Arab or Jewish. Recognizing that “history” has been strategically clouded,  pictures or videos of are too few and far between and unearthing the true references will take time but on the other hand, modern day events make these Transitist techniques easy to spot with the help of national media coverage. Coupled with the debut of missing words like these, the general public will now be able to properly identify and refer to these events in an accurate way, thereby sidestepping the tension, confusion and exposing the offenders real identity in the process.

George Zimmerman provides a widely recognized example. Lets look closely to expose the Transitist technique.  His father is ethnically Jewish, mother is Peruvian and in the physical sense, he is brown or looks Hispanic. Pay close attention to all of the different identities he used and how he went between them in a transitory way. He can call him self Jewish, Peruvian, Hispanic, etc. But, what identity did he use after shooting Trayvon? He chose to call him self “white”. He used this as a decoy to hide his Hispanic/ Jewish ancestry, he used a term that does not reflect his physical appearance and, for a short period of time until his photo was leaked, was able to shift blame for his shameful acts to ethnic groups he is not a member of. Of course, his scam crashed once his photo was released and the general public (some retaliating) stopped attacking “white” people and began attacking, well, “brown people”. Consider how the Transitist technique is used by the education system and how many of their “history” lessons would fall apart if a photo could be released like Zimmerman’s did.

Is it really irony that, over the course of weeks while nation wide attacks were taking place, all the way up to that point, there was nothing but silence from groups like La Raza ? But oh the ruckus they made once the world knew the truth that Trayvon’s killer was not really “white” but dark brown and Hispanic. Hearing the current president of La Raza make the statement that “blacks and Latinos need to stay focused on the enemy” confirmed the shared ideology she had with the founder Jose Angel Gutierrez when he said in so many words that “The devil has white skin, blue eyes and we must kill him” (story here). Funny that none of them like to reference the “San Diego Plan of 1915” or the real reasons Mexicans were banned from the U.S. I do admit that the way she speaks does not impress me but I do marvel at the Transitist technique she does so well, highlighted by the fact that the only reason she calls herself American is to hide her real ethnicity (Mexican). Her foreign loyalty shines too brightly and needs more than verbal lies to stay covered. At this point it’s a pretty clear and simple when pointing out how often European identities are misused by people who are not of European lineage. Collecting any MSM news articles can easily confirm patterns that, when doing something bad, they will use a European identity like French, American, Canadian and so on but when receiving accolades or pursuing special privileges, they use their real identities, ones that are not European.  Think of it this way, if George Zimmerman wanted better odds of college enrollment, scholarships or job opportunities, would he still call himself “white” or would he use his real identity? The overall idea is pretty obvious and it branches out to more complex scenarios.

Take people that actually look the same or similar to the groups they ambush, I know that all people are not the same simply because they are the same color whether it be brown, white or black but rest assured, Transitists never resist the opportunity to take advantage of groups they look similar to, just look in the education sector at people like Noel Ignatev or Tim Wise who use the decoy term of “white” to speak on behalf of all “white people”, calling to dissolve their communities, countries and to systemically disadvantage them to correct past wrongs but Noel, Tim and many others know it won’t really effect them in the end, because they are really ethnically Jewish and receive “minority privilege”. Notice that they don’t publicly call to systemically disadvantage Jewish people or people who are physically brown (like Arabs)  but use the term “white” like George Zimmerman did. They call themselves “white” as a decoy, to hide their real ethnicity, speak on behalf of or sabotage other groups they are not members of but will only use their real identity behind closed doors.

The list goes on and on and consider that we live in an age of throttling select ethnic groups to redistribute assets, wealth or political representation. Finding that a Transitist has hijacked the share meant for another group or misrepresented them in a poor way so the Transitist can secretly benefit their real group explains a lot, it explains why things have deteriorated, it explains how people who are not members of protected groups were left with no genuine political representation or voice and most importantly, it has finally revealed the technique that Transitst use to sabotage them on the highest levels.