Narrative Warfare

What do you know about narrative warfare ?

Marxists use an attack technique I refer to as “narrative warfare.” I characterize narrative warfare as constructing a narrative that is intended to cause a public backlash against a particular group. These narratives are then delivered using a large public platform like media or the education system, so as to cause social eruptions. Narrative warfare is used to agitate the general population, instigate riots and incite violence. It can also be used as a means of weakening an entire society by using perpetual guilt narratives and conditioning its population to be submissive, no longer defend themselves or their way of life and prepare to disappear.

When a group is targeted with narrative warfare, one will notice the steady and continual release of negative narratives from highly visible and influential platforms; these narratives are designed to result in social backlash against the target group.
Even if the narrative is old, told thousands of times already and all sides of the public are tired of hearing it, the Marxists continue to distribute and use it over and over again because it still works, and continues to cause new attacks on their target.

This is usually why there is a fight over who gets to tell the story. The person who controls the narrative has immense power. The words chosen and narrative constructed can be used as a weapon because of how it will cause the population react. This is also the reason the Left guards the public platform with great hostility and tries to block counter narratives by de-platforming, censorship tactics or accusations of “hate speech” so that the narratives they have constructed can not be challenged or invalidated. As long as they control the narrative that is shown to the general population, they control what the population thinks and how they will react to certain situations.

Who uses narrative warfare ?

Narrative warfare is used by individuals and organizations on the left who have contempt for a society and seek different ways to destabilize and destroy that society, its people and their entire way of life, from within. Take Marxists for example, they destroy society by any means necessary and utilize narrative warfare to use the men, women and children of the general population as their disposable weapon. Since Marxists make up a small percentage of the general population, they are unable to win a physical war as they are grossly outnumbered, but they can create and circulate narratives that will get one part of the population to carry out revenge attacks against another part of the population for them, resulting in mutual destruction, and weakening the host nation from within.

These narratives can be made up of false accusations or “hollow circular arguments” and to the general public on the receiving end, these narratives are assumed to be truthful and often treated seriously. Well-intentioned people spend countless hours researching statistics and trends in attempt to document any proof for some of the most wild accusations. But, to the Marxist who made up the argument, it was never about being truthful; it was about accomplishing their goals.
The Marxists real intention is to make up arguments and narratives that will cause one part of the population to react by carrying out retaliation attacks against another part of the population (doing their destructive work them). While we have seen tons of well-meaning citizens in the media pour their heart out or make a large effort to make things right, you’ll notice the Marxists lack true empathy; they act as if nothing will ever be good enough for them and sometimes, you’ll see them enjoy watching the other person toil away, wasting their energy because they are unaware that they have been tricked by nothing more than a cleverly worded argument.

 

What are some of the platforms used for delivery ?

Uses in Media :

We have all noticed certain manipulation patterns in media reporting over the years.

We have noticed when articles decide to list what color a perpetrator is versus when they will use a euphemism like “teens, youths or protesters” to conceal their identity and motive.

We all notice which stories get reported nationally, and which stories get ignored and how this dependable pattern determines which populations receive public backlash and criticism for their behavior and which populations get a free pass.

We see bogus agitation articles structured to self-justify by using tricky opening remarks like “there are calls for this and that, or anonymous sources say ….” but we’re never told who is making these mysterious “calls“ and have no way to know if the so-called anonymous source actually exists or if it’s a fellow activist sitting at the table next to whom ever wrote the article. This method works well with a deploy and amplify strategy. Certain activist groups who are good at crafting narratives designed to manipulate the population in to conflict hand off to a media platform that’s used to amplify that narrative and instigate a public commotion. They just claim those magic words “anonymous sources say” and they seem to escape accountability. Then they repeat the process.

Consider all these fake “hate crimes” and “staged racism”. An activist group and a media platform partner up using the deploy and amplify strategy knowing it’s the host population who will be automatically suspected by the general public and targeted with the social backlash when, for example, a swastika is randomly painted on a wall somewhere or little string nooses are planted on college campuses. Media shouts the lie on the front page and then whispers the correction a week or two later on the back page somewhere at the bottom, long after the “racial justice” attacks have occurred, and their mission has been completed.

Just think of the large-scale destruction one person is capable of if they were to immigrate to another society, and use a media platform to continually show that population movies or distribute articles that are highly sensitive and agitating to the people there. Research their history, revive old forgotten tensions or past wrongs between various groups and produce articles that will manipulate those groups in to conflict. If you want to destroy the nation from within, circulate articles that will urge splinter groups in the population to unite and carry out joint retaliation attacks against the main host population. Run article after article packed with Marxist-style arguments making up any random reason you can think of to vandalize and tear down all of their cultural symbols, ban their national flag, attack traditional values, subvert their immigration system and release weaponized ideologies that will destroy their family structure to stop them from replenishing their population.

This is also a clever means for one ethnic sub-group to carry out indirect attacks against its host nation. Lets say your group makes up a very small percentage of the population there and just happen to hate that society and its people. There is no way you can wage a physical war because you are grossly outnumbered and destined to lose. You can, however, manipulate other portions of the population to carry out some attacks against the host nation for you, and weaken that society from within. Just continually make and release movies and articles that will agitate random disparate groups and cause them to carry out revenge attacks against the host nation. If this is done repeatedly and for a long period of time, you can actually destroy an entire nation by causing it to rot from the inside out. No need for an army or physical forms of warfare, just use “narrative warfare” to circulate false, invented narratives that will continually cause riots and other forms of conflict. This way, you destroy the country from within by using their own men, women and children as your fodder—while keeping your own ethnic group safe in the process.

See how this works ? The agitation agent just needs a large visible platform to deliver the narrative and can enter the society posing as a movie star, late night talk-show host or even a comedian. As long as the platform reaches enough people, the agitation agent can use it to continually deliver the agitation narratives and simply wear the job title of comedian or talk-show host as a beard.

Something to consider when analyzing media. The next time you see someone on television using tactics that agitate the general population or denigrate your cultural symbols, identity, holidays, norms or religion. Research that person’s identity and locate which ethnic sub-group they belong to. See if they subject their own sub-group to the same treatment or if they’re only doing this to other groups. If they protect their own group from these tactics while simultaneously using these tactics on other groups, then you must further question if this was really just comedy or entertainment, or if their TV personality title is just a disguise and their real purpose is to carry out one-sided attacks on your population and weaken your society from within.

 

Uses in Education:

Do teachers use narrative warfare? Yes, activist teachers can engage in narrative warfare because academic freedom lets them choose which collection of narratives to use and determine the social effect they want to have on their students.

The education platform has been used to create many splinter groups through specialty studies programs ranging from feminism to ethnic studies, all of which are united on a common theme of resenting and degrading the host society, its founding population and their norms.

Ethnic studies programs provide a good example. Most of the lesson plans have been constructed by Marxist teachers who choose a collection of stories that will result in resentment against the host nation. Stories that highlight past partnership or would inspire coexistence and mutual respect are intentionally excluded. It’s easy to prove this is done deliberately because the teacher controls what literature is used and whether or not they want their class to feel resentment towards the host society, and inspire acts of aggression against it. Their real intention is clear, activist teachers use the education platform to condition a part of the general population and create a demographic weapon that can be used to carry out internal attacks. This also explains the decades long use of “one-sided slave narratives”. The real intention was never to teach our population about slavery but to conceal conflicting narratives and only choose a collection of stories meant to radicalize one portion of the population and mobilize it to carry out continuous revenge attacks against the host population.

The collection of stories and narratives used in classrooms are mainly controlled by a group of teachers who combine to make up the “curriculum committee”. Along with the Dean of curriculum, this committee decides which collection of stories will be allowed in the pool of literature teachers can select from to use in their classrooms. This curriculum committee also has the power to ensure that the entire pool of literature that the teachers can select from, only contains narratives that will condition students to feel angry and resentful.

That said, you’ll notice special treatment is given to the groups of students who become agitated from this collection of narratives, and engage in hostile behavior. The teachers encourage these special treatment groups to retaliate and rename their acts of aggression to “justice”. Most special treatment groups are given a free pass from behavioral requirements and discipline which by design, seems to create an atmosphere of perpetual unrest and destabilization on campus.

In addition, there is also an established “campus caste” in which some groups are taught to be critical of other groups, but not the other way around. Special treatment groups are given a platform plus on site training to create and deliver narratives that will cause retaliation against other groups, but the other groups whom are targeted are denied equal training and strictly forbidden from doing the same thing back.

How is such a biased atmosphere allowed? Upon investigation you’ll see most policies and laws function in sync with narrative warfare because they are creatively worded to only provide their protections to the special treatment groups and not provide equal protection to the host population. Since no policies have been written to protect the host population from the attacks carried out by the special treatment groups, the school admin is only required to respond and enforce a system of one-sided surveillance and one-sided behavioral discipline which has resulted in synthetic dominance on campus.

The end result ? The special treatment groups are trained to target others with various forms of harassment and those on the receiving end who do not receive special treatment or protections are unable to get out of striking distance because of the forced association policies currently in place.

My question to you, the reader. Consider the comedians, talk-show hosts or media companies who exhibit the pattern of only discussing topics or reporting stories that will result in retaliation attacks against the host population, or the politicians who use guilt narratives against their own people to force things on them that they would otherwise reject and ask yourself. What sort of public reaction do they deserve to experience once the general population figures out what has been done?

Denial of Identity

The longer I’ve been in school the more I notice how the literature they use has been reworded so it no longer refers to me as American. I have seen it refer to everything else as American though. People who are not even legal citizens of our society or have no ancestral link to the American lineage are being referred to as American, but the population who originated the American cultural identity is not. Just think, the American identity which was originated by my ancestors and intended to be an identifier of my culture and heritage is being denied to me simply by the way they have reworded our literature and the inside-out way they are teaching people to use it now. But when we notice such a pattern we must ask ourselves some questions: who would want to reword our academic literature so that we are no longer referred to as Americans (while using our public school system as a mass delivery platform) and what is it they’re looking to accomplish?

Let me ask you this: Do you think it’s possible to erase an entire culture along with its people by repeatedly telling them they do not exist and denying recognition of their identity? Of course you can! Cultural Marxism is going mainstream here in America and we see its followers implementing this very tactic through our education system.

Think about it: if you wanted to invalidate any group’s cultural identity, making sure their identity is no longer reinforced socially is a necessary step. Notice how common this practice has become in universities, media and other social platforms that we’re repeatedly told we have no unique cultural identifier, our cultural identity is vague, non-existent.

This concept is called denial of identity and it is used by Marxists to debase our cultural identity by routinely delegitimizing us socially in order to negate our existence as a people.

Consider this: if there’s no name to call your heritage or ancestry, then you might as well not exist, right? I mean, if you truly existed, there would be a unique identity for you, your culture and your people, correct?  Well, not if Marxists find a way to deny that identity to you.

Everyone on this planet has an identifier of their culture and heritage which is the accumulation of ancestral experience, accomplishment, knowledge, norms, foods, holidays, language, symbolism, traditions etc. For each of us, our ancestors originated an identity to encompass a unique combination of all of these things, which combine to make us who we are as a people.  The purpose of our identity is to provide unique recognition of our culture and heritage and to set us apart from the rest of the world.

The goal of the Marxist is to take that identity away from you. They want to take the actual name that your ancestors originated to encompass everything that makes you, and deny it to you. By denying recognition of it, they deny unique recognition of you as a people and negate your very existence. You see, to deny the identity of your group, is to deny the existence of your group. This concept introduces the threat of social alienation, displacement and will eventually result in the dispossession of identity.

To normalize this, you will see Marxists openly proclaim that your heritage and culture is not real or it doesn’t exist. In addition, they will carefully word their literature to support these narratives and ensure that your cultural identity will no longer be used when referring to you. This ensures your cultural identity is no longer reinforced or validated through practice, and eventually, no longer acknowledged in common social interactions.

This is one of the main reasons Marxists fight so hard to control the narrative: so they can reword the literature, and thereby train others to stop using your cultural identity to refer to you.  This type of distortion is highly effective because most people assume the meaning of an identity based on the way they see it used publicly. As this effect compounds with more and more people participating each year, it will eventually normalize denial of identity on a large scale by changing the actual speech pattern used by society and thereby making it common and mainstream.

This tactic is introduced through ways which are mostly unnoticeable and appear to be innocent. You’ll see it built-in to common public questioning, subtle remarks, scripted events and random unimportant literature. To the Marxist, it does not matter which social channel this comes through. Whether it be a magazine or low-budget entertainment, the main purpose is just to saturate a society in it, so they can normalize it and eventually change the way society talks.

As a student, I noticed that all of the literature used by my school, has been reworded  so it does not refer to me or my heritage as American, and in cases where it does use the American identity, it uses it in the most inside-out way possible. Analyzing this pattern in all of the literature, the precision it’s being done with, and the amount of internal coordination this requires, the natural conclusion is that denial of identity has intentionally been built-in to the literature used at my public school.

When a school exposes students to these lesson plans, without telling them they’re doing it, it’s a form of “indirect teaching”. When teachers use literature that has this woven in to it, in addition to the main subject they’re teaching, they’re also indirectly teaching students not to refer to the population who originated the American identity, as American. Through repetition, and over a long enough period of time, the teacher trains them to deny that cultural recognition to the originator of the American identity, by training the students not to use the term American, when referring to the population who originated it.

Watch for this pattern. Look closely at your literature. Pay attention to who’s being referred to as American and who’s not. Pay attention to the scripting being used on radio, television or in movies. Who are they referring to as the Americans?

Analyze the timing and coordination this has been rolled out with in other western European societies. The literature used in their schools along with everything produced by mainstream media has been reworded to no longer refer to the Irish as Irish, the Swedish as Swedish nor the French as French. Media will refer to people from all over the world who are pouring in to those countries using those cultural identities, but not the native populations who originated them, and rely on them as an identifier of their culture and lineage. Media routinely uses some broad, alternate or ambiguous term when referring to the native populations but they refuse to use these cultural identities in a way that will reinforce them, and acknowledge them as the identity of that native population. They won’t do it, because they want to invert the way society sees it used, change the speech pattern of that society and disassociate the native population from their own cultural identity by using denial of identity on them.  Just think how this all fits together on a large-scale. With repetition, academia working in coordination with media, will do this long enough to normalize it and it will result in the dispossession of identity and displacement of the population who originated it. It is for the sake of our next generation that these narratives be challenged.

Let us all be mindful of the various types of shock that the other western European based societies are being put through. Most if not all of their literature has been reworded and media purposefully broadcasts the use of their identity in an inside-out way, while simultaneously flooding them with global traffic. This is actually turning their social order and society inside-out. And this is without any of this being disclosed, just being done to them in a coordinated and subversive way. Randomly flashing these messages at them through their television screens or placing it on random billboards, public advertisements and weaving it in to their literature. Let’s be considerate of what they’re experiencing as many of them don’t fully understand whats being done to them yet, or don’t have the words they need to describe it or defend themselves. Let’s give them the words ….

This is my call to action for the student population. As students, we have a very special role to play in challenging denial of identity. Since this is being delivered through our education system, we are the only demographic who can internally purge this from our schools as we are in the belly of the beast, and have a level of access that no-one else has. The use of any literature containing this element must be disputed at the student level. Literature that uses our identity in an inside out way, or denies its rightful recognition to us, must be unanimously rejected. Students must no longer participate in normalizing this, or aiding Marxists in any way.

If your professor is using literature where this element is present, bring this to their attention. Reiterate that the American identity was originated by our demographic and intended to be used as a unique identifier of our culture and heritage and that we don’t want to be immersed in literature that uses our identity in an inside out way.

Separately, let’s begin the process of institutional change. To get your school to change the literature they use, students must file a request directly with the Dean of curriculum or curriculum committee. Since they are the ones who select the pool of literature that teachers can select from, this message needs to be delivered to them directly. Discuss some of the talking points from this article, check to ensure they understand why you will no longer participate, validate or be pressured to help them normalize the use of your cultural identity in an inside-out way or in a way that will disassociate it from you. On these grounds, you can enter a demand that the school administration provide you with classes and literature structured to reinforce your cultural identity.

I want this to be one piece of the criteria that we will use on the student level, to dispute and purge marxist literature from our school system under the reasoning that its using “denial of identity” on us.  In addition, remember that most schools are run on a for profit basis or have a negative impact if their profits decline, so request a refund on all books, materials and classes that contain this element, get their full attention! Organize your fellow students to increase the impact and encourage a boycott.

Most schools have adopted a policy which obligates them to use material that’s culturally relevant to the student population and forbids differential treatment. Let’s organize on the student level to ensure we notify the school administration when a violation of these policies occur. The existing model for student organizations fail to tackle important issues like these because they are old, outdated and most are infected with some form of Marxist rot. The time has come for White-ethnic American students to form next generation student unions and networks that have the capacity to take important conversations such as these, and bring them forward to be socially acknowledged. We need student networks and resources that focus on undoing the negative social effects caused by the use of Marxist literature and that give us an opportunity to work directly with the school administration towards a solution, and in turn, help them meet their obligation to provide us with a learning environment that’s free of these elements.

That said, it’s also important to challenge denial of identity outside of the education system as well. The best way to challenge denial of identity is through assertion of identity. Show others when you notice denial of identity being used by the media or random literature. Any one of us can take the time to correct someone’s remarks if they use our identity in an inaccurate or inside-out way. Let them know you noticed that they said that. Also, take a few minutes to write a letter directly to the publisher or the media outlet of books or magazines requesting that they use your identity in the correct way moving forward. Create an online database to register books or materials that have this woven into it so people in other locations know to look for it. Bring this to the attention of your local politicians or friends in the legal or academic field and ask if there’s anything they can do. Most importantly, we must not limit this corrective action to America, Let’s encourage this activism in every western society undergoing this type of attack.

We Americans have a freedom and capacity that the rest of the world does not have, Let us use our free media platform as well as freedom of speech to speak out on behalf of others who would be punished or arrested if they attempt to do so. Let us be a voice for our brothers, sisters and their children from Europe to South Africa, Australia and anywhere else they may need us.

Get going now! Assert and reinforce your cultural identity through pride and practice, and feel good about yourself while you do it! This is the identity that your ancestors made for you! This is your birthright!

Why Marxists Always Refer to You by Your Color

It’s important to understand that the way a Marxist will destroy a society is by imploding it. They don’t overpower it physically though, they rely on controlled narratives and certain linguistic structures to create social hatred directed at the host culture then leverage different groups off one another to destroy it. Through this strategy, they use the men, women and children of a society to carry out their cultural warfare against the host population. One tactic they use to place “class blame” and encourage infighting is by referring to people by their color.

Think about all of the different choices we have when we refer to a person. We can refer to them by their gender, their class, their religion, ethnic identity, nationality, sexual orientation or we can refer to them by their color. If you’re having a conversation or writing an article, the way you refer to them will automatically set the narrative, and determine if the topic you’re discussing, is a matter of religion, gender, sexuality or color. It also decides which group holds responsibility or will be blamed for the topic at hand.

When we refer to people by their color, it’s done on the basis of visual observation, and you have four choices which are White, Black, Brown or Yellow people.

Pay close attention here, when you refer to people by their color, it has global reach. You’re cutting across all boundaries, countries, cultures and referring to a chunk of the global population all at the same time, who happen to be the same color. Notice that, using the term “brown people” does not make a distinction of whom you’re talking about. You’re not distinguishing between people from a particular country, or ethnic group. Nope, you’re placing them all in the same bucket and can blame them or ridicule them all at the same time, globally.

What ever you’re talking about, will automatically reflect on ALL “brown people” globally, because they are, visibly brown (they cannot escape that). We can all tell who is brown and who is not, simply by looking at them, and, in the back of our minds, will remember everything we were taught about brown people by schools and media. Over time, this will compound socially and shape the public image of all brown people by creating a permanent reputation for their group globally.

Take the thousands of media articles published on major events like 9/11 or high-profile shootings like San Bernardino, Fort Hood, Pulse Nightclub, UCLA and so on. Now, keep every printed sentence of the articles and media coverage the same, just change one word, change what ever description they used for the shooter to their color. What happens now is that all media reporting, school lessons and global conversations would pivot from conversations about what ever identity was used, to conversations about brown people (all brown people at the same time). When Marxists write a news article, or a school lesson plan, they exploit this method to cause social problems, destabilization and violence amongst the population.

Try this, take any media article and shift where blame and social animosity is directed by simply changing one word, the description of the perpetrator. Change the social impact of the entire story, and the feelings of people who read it.

Gender = Man shoots man ( seems like violence between men, no social agitation)

Color  = This color person shoots that color person (racial undertones, public agitation, possible riots and revenge attacks)

Religion = A member of this religion shoots a member of that religion (can inflame  sectarian violence)

Age =  A ‘youth” shoots a ‘youth’ (society criticises the younger generation)

Notice that, when we reformat the above mentioned articles to reference the color of the attacker, it will now reflect on all brown people regardless of origin and what’s going to happen is, societal backlash such as media ridicule and revenge attacks will be redirected towards them globally, regardless of ethnicity, heritage or physical location. Random brown people all over the world will feel like they’re being “framed” and put on trial for something that shouldn’t be their fault. They’ll say things like, you know “ you shouldn’t generalize ” or, “don’t paint us all with such a broad brush ”. These responses are all correct because that’s the intended effect of this technique, that’s why Marxists use it as a linguistic weapon against entire societies, and teach incoming populations to refer to the host population this way because it’s highly effective, and will eventually lead to a societal implosion.

Consider how these effects have been amplified and normalized when used on large platforms like radio, television, or incorporated it certain professions by attorneys, comedians and teachers. With access to the education institutions of a country, you can use this literary format on their young children to teach them to talk this way and condition them all the way up to graduation.

Just think of the large-scale conditioning I’m capable of if given access to the education system. If I were a Marxist, who secured funding and justified restructuring educational material to be critical, demoralize or ridicule brown people, that material is not confined to the country I developed it in. I can circulate it through the education system globally and it can be used in every brown country around the world because I have structured my literature to automatically reflect on anyone who is brown, regardless of ethnicity or heritage, it can implode every brown society this way.

Just imagine the social destruction I’m capable of. If this is how I structure every news paper article, remarks in movies or the daily news, I can attack an entire society from hundreds of different angles and all sides. Imagine if I began flooding Mexico with immigrants from all over the world, then simultaneously flipped the literature they use in their schools to ridicule brown people, the recently imported populations will feel justified resentment toward brown people (the host culture) while the Mexicans themselves will become self-destructive and suffer the negative psychological effects of class guilt. I can take that exact same literature and export it to other brown countries like India or Pakistan and the exact same thing will happen there too.  Now, look closely at how literature has been structured to say this about “white people” without ever saying which ones, and has been circulated through the education systems and used against the children of countries like Ireland, America or Sweden etc.

Think back when you were younger, apply what we’re discussing here today to the literature that was used on you in school. Notice how they always said “white people” without ever saying which ones? (There’s different kinds).  It’s because the architect of that literature didn’t want to be specific and say which ethnic group or subgroup they were ridiculing because the real purpose of that literature was to attack an entire class of people globally, regardless of their ethnicity, heritage or location. They were able to do it all at once, and the way they were able to do it, is by structuring the literature to refer to them by their color, so it can be used over and over again, in multiple different countries.

Additionally, if I import outside groups and, through controlled narrative, teach those kids that the only way they refer to the parent culture is by their color, then I have successfully installed this permanent “linguistic fix” that will remain continual and will ensure social conflict caused by this will not stop until the school books are reworded and kids are taught to refer to the parent culture by their nationality or cultural identity instead of by their color.

Consider that, the books used in schools, and language used in media have not been structured to do this to brown people, but they are structured to do this to white people.

Take the time to look for this pattern, you’re going to notice it everywhere, and this is going to answer a lot of questions about negative social interactions and viewpoints. I would like you to pay attention to what percentage of time your being referred to by your color by the media, teachers or other students, instead of being referred to by your nationality or cultural identity. Once you know to look for this pattern, you will also notice the level of precision it’s executed with which verifies this has been well thought out and released in to your society on purpose. Think of this as “language programming” secretly introduced in a very subtle way through the education system.

Although we can’t immediately change the way school literature has been worded, we can immediately change the way we word our conversations, social media, school assignments and articles that we produce. To counter these linguistics, you must reword the way you refer to people using one of four colors to make this “class blame” technique visible to everyone else which will then cancel out the negative social effects.

Activists who utilize this make it impossible to discuss complex topics like these and as a strategy, resort to never-ending circular arguments but using it back on them, will force them to think and eventually, to understand. It’s simply faster and more effective to refer back to them by their color. Once they’re on the receiving end of this type of language, they will experience the effects first hand, and you will reach an understanding with them much faster. Also, feel confident when using this method at school  and explain that referring to people by their color, in order to place “class blame” is a technique that’s currently being taught in our schools, it’s just not a two-way street yet, but this is being taught to students publicly so we all get to use this now. If a teacher or activist asks you why your saying brown people, black people or yellow people, tell them it’s for all the same reasons they say white people. Remind teachers they have an obligation to create the same environment for all students which means, all students will now be referred to by their color, or none will at all. Apply what you learned here today to any literature distributed in class or on campus, and include these talking points when criticizing it or rejecting it all together. Be confident when incorporating this in your essays, class discussions and making this a regular part of your social conversations because this is how we will take control of language on a grass-roots level and neutralize this.

Identity Shoppers

An identity shopper is exactly what it sounds like, it’s a person who will use other cultural identities they have no ancestral link to, as a type of marxist activism. Before you can understand the motive of the identity shopper, you must first understand the goal of marxists.

If the goal of the marxist is to erase every cultural identity globally, the challenge becomes, how to get every group to surrender their identity. How do you separate them from their unique identifier so they can then be erased? Since no group of people would willingly forfeit their identity, marxists look for ways to take it from them.

Look back a few years at the context your identity was used in, you’ll notice its been changed. Most literature as well as the way you heard your identity used socially always reinforced it as the unique identifier of your ethnicity or heritage. To begin the separation process, the marxists simply reworded literature to change the context your identity gets used in so it’s no longer unique to you.

School books and magazines that once used your identity in a way which reinforced it as your ethnicity or heritage, are slowly replaced with books and magazines that have been reworded to use your identity in a way that separates it from you, imply that it’s not specific to you and that the whole world can use it too.

The success of this separation technique depends on whether or not you can normalize it and get an entire society to switch the way they use their identity from one that is specific to them, to one that is no longer specific to them or their heritage. Once you have separated the identity from the target population, you can then introduce high volumes of outsiders and unrelated populations that will inevitably scramble them away.

With no unique word to call their heritage, lineage or population, they will slowly disappear into a sea of global traffic. Leaving virtually no evidence that they ever existed and no record that this simple, subtle manipulation technique was used to disappear them.

To get this process started, marxists will encourage identity shopping by sending an invitation to outsiders and foreigners encouraging them to start using ethnic and cultural identities which do not belong to them. The same marxists will then surveil the targeted group and apply social pressure, threats or accusations of racism if they resist the destruction of their identity.

While the targeted population is disabled, the outsiders are given a platform and encouraged to use the hijacked identity out of context, as much as possible, with the goal of normalizing it. You will see low-budget media or simple hashtag campaigns that may appear innocent in nature but they’re not, they’re intended to saturate the public and normalize the distortion of identity. Once this is done for a long enough period of time, the marxists have succeeded in taking the identity away from the target population. Left with no unique name for their heritage or ethnicity, their ability to continue as a people has also been taken away.

The identity shopper is a marxist agitator who accepts the invitation to violate the identities of other cultures and heritages. They publicly call themselves the name of someone else’s people with the intention of vandalizing the meaning of someone else identity, and scrambling it away. They’re often given a media platform and encouraged to agitate the target population by treating the hijacked identity in a poor or disrespectful way. Eventually, public arguments with the agitator will erupt and the very people who originated the cultural identity, are now arguing over its meaning, with the people who didn’t.

Reject identity shoppers, do not validate their rhetoric or their marxist agenda. When no longer on stage, you will often catch them revert back to using their real identity (the one they’re highly protective of) and when you catch them, call them out! Ask them why they’re using someone else’s identity if everyone knows it’s not their ethnicity. Find out their real identity and ask them why they’re not using that one instead. Call them an identity shopper, “out them” tell them you know exactly what they’re up to.

Include this topic in mainstream conversations pertaining to cultural matters. Feel confident when asking someone not to use your ethnic or cultural identity out of context. Reiterate that using someone else’s identity is a form of cultural appropriation, it’s destructive and it’s not acceptable. Tell them that you refuse to validate marxist tactics or normalize “identity shopping”. Tell them, if their ancestors didn’t originate that cultural identity, then they shouldn’t be using it.

Remember to reinforce your own cultural identity and make sure it’s used in a way that reinforces it, instead of distorts it. Use it in a way that refers to yourself, your heritage and your ancestry when you speak, or in the literature that you produce and use. Feel confident challenging those, whom undermine or challenge the meaning of your identity.  Be confident when publicly criticizing identity shoppers.