Denial of Identity

american-identity_design.pngThe longer I’ve been in school the more I notice how the literature they use has been reworded so it no longer refers to me as American. I have seen it refer to everything else as American though. People who are not even legal citizens of our society or have no ancestral link to the American lineage are being referred to as American, but the population who originated the American cultural identity is not. Just think, the American identity which was originated by my ancestors and intended to be an identifier of my culture and heritage is being denied to me simply by the way they have reworded our literature and the inside-out way they are teaching people to use it now. But when we notice such a pattern we must ask ourselves some questions: who would want to reword our academic literature so that we are no longer referred to as Americans (while using our public school system as a mass delivery platform) and what is it they’re looking to accomplish?

Let me ask you this: Do you think it’s possible to erase an entire culture along with its people by repeatedly telling them they do not exist and denying recognition of their identity? Of course you can! Cultural Marxism is going mainstream here in America and we see its followers implementing this very tactic through our education system.

Think about it: if you wanted to invalidate any group’s cultural identity, making sure their identity is no longer reinforced socially is a necessary step. Notice how common this practice has become in universities, media and other social platforms that we’re repeatedly told we have no unique cultural identifier, our cultural identity is vague, non-existent.

This concept is called denial of identity and it is used by Marxists to debase our cultural identity by routinely delegitimizing us socially in order to negate our existence as a people.

Consider this: if there’s no name to call your heritage or ancestry, then you might as well not exist, right? I mean, if you truly existed, there would be a unique identity for you, your culture and your people, correct?  Well, not if Marxists find a way to deny that identity to you.

Everyone on this planet has an identifier of their culture and heritage which is the accumulation of ancestral experience, accomplishment, knowledge, norms, foods, holidays, language, symbolism, traditions etc. For each of us, our ancestors originated an identity to encompass a unique combination of all of these things, which combine to make us who we are as a people.  The purpose of our identity is to provide unique recognition of our culture and heritage and to set us apart from the rest of the world.

The goal of the Marxist is to take that identity away from you. They want to take the actual name that your ancestors originated to encompass everything that makes you, and deny it to you. By denying recognition of it, they deny unique recognition of you as a people and negate your very existence. You see, to deny the identity of your group, is to deny the existence of your group. This concept introduces the threat of social alienation, displacement and will eventually result in the dispossession of identity.

To normalize this, you will see Marxists openly proclaim that your heritage and culture is not real or it doesn’t exist. In addition, they will carefully word their literature to support these narratives and ensure that your cultural identity will no longer be used when referring to you. This ensures your cultural identity is no longer reinforced or validated through practice, and eventually, no longer acknowledged in common social interactions.

This is one of the main reasons Marxists fight so hard to control the narrative: so they can reword the literature, and thereby train others to stop using your cultural identity to refer to you.  This type of distortion is highly effective because most people assume the meaning of an identity based on the way they see it used publicly. As this effect compounds with more and more people participating each year, it will eventually normalize denial of identity on a large scale by changing the actual speech pattern used by society and thereby making it common and mainstream.

This tactic is introduced through ways which are mostly unnoticeable and appear to be innocent. You’ll see it built-in to common public questioning, subtle remarks, scripted events and random unimportant literature. To the Marxist, it does not matter which social channel this comes through. Whether it be a magazine or low-budget entertainment, the main purpose is just to saturate a society in it, so they can normalize it and eventually change the way society talks.

As a student, I noticed that all of the literature used by my school, has been reworded  so it does not refer to me or my heritage as American, and in cases where it does use the American identity, it uses it in the most inside-out way possible. Analyzing this pattern in all of the literature, the precision it’s being done with, and the amount of internal coordination this requires, the natural conclusion is that denial of identity has intentionally been built-in to the literature used at my public school.

When a school exposes students to these lesson plans, without telling them they’re doing it, it’s a form of “indirect teaching”. When teachers use literature that has this woven in to it, in addition to the main subject they’re teaching, they’re also indirectly teaching students not to refer to the population who originated the American identity, as American. Through repetition, and over a long enough period of time, the teacher trains them to deny that cultural recognition to the originator of the American identity, by training the students not to use the term American, when referring to the population who originated it.

Watch for this pattern. Look closely at your literature. Pay attention to who’s being referred to as American and who’s not. Pay attention to the scripting being used on radio, television or in movies. Who are they referring to as the Americans?

Analyze the timing and coordination this has been rolled out with in other western European societies. The literature used in their schools along with everything produced by mainstream media has been reworded to no longer refer to the Irish as Irish, the Swedish as Swedish nor the French as French. Media will refer to people from all over the world who are pouring in to those countries using those cultural identities, but not the native populations who originated them, and rely on them as an identifier of their culture and lineage. Media routinely uses some broad, alternate or ambiguous term when referring to the native populations but they refuse to use these cultural identities in a way that will reinforce them, and acknowledge them as the identity of that native population. They won’t do it, because they want to invert the way society sees it used, change the speech pattern of that society and disassociate the native population from their own cultural identity by using denial of identity on them.  Just think how this all fits together on a large-scale. With repetition, academia working in coordination with media, will do this long enough to normalize it and it will result in the dispossession of identity and displacement of the population who originated it. It is for the sake of our next generation that these narratives be challenged.

Let us all be mindful of the various types of shock that the other western European based societies are being put through. Most if not all of their literature has been reworded and media purposefully broadcasts the use of their identity in an inside-out way, while simultaneously flooding them with global traffic. This is actually turning their social order and society inside-out. And this is without any of this being disclosed, just being done to them in a coordinated and subversive way. Randomly flashing these messages at them through their television screens or placing it on random billboards, public advertisements and weaving it in to their literature. Let’s be considerate of what they’re experiencing as many of them don’t fully understand whats being done to them yet, or don’t have the words they need to describe it or defend themselves. Let’s give them the words ….

This is my call to action for the student population. As students, we have a very special role to play in challenging denial of identity. Since this is being delivered through our education system, we are the only demographic who can internally purge this from our schools as we are in the belly of the beast, and have a level of access that no-one else has. The use of any literature containing this element must be disputed at the student level. Literature that uses our identity in an inside out way, or denies its rightful recognition to us, must be unanimously rejected. Students must no longer participate in normalizing this, or aiding Marxists in any way.

If your professor is using literature where this element is present, bring this to their attention. Reiterate that the American identity was originated by our demographic and intended to be used as a unique identifier of our culture and heritage and that we don’t want to be immersed in literature that uses our identity in an inside out way.

Separately, let’s begin the process of institutional change. To get your school to change the literature they use, students must file a request directly with the Dean of curriculum or curriculum committee. Since they are the ones who select the pool of literature that teachers can select from, this message needs to be delivered to them directly. Discuss some of the talking points from this article, check to ensure they understand why you will no longer participate, validate or be pressured to help them normalize the use of your cultural identity in an inside-out way or in a way that will disassociate it from you. On these grounds, you can enter a demand that the school administration provide you with classes and literature structured to reinforce your cultural identity.

I want this to be one piece of the criteria that we will use on the student level, to dispute and purge marxist literature from our school system under the reasoning that its using “denial of identity” on us.  In addition, remember that most schools are run on a for profit basis or have a negative impact if their profits decline, so request a refund on all books, materials and classes that contain this element, get their full attention! Organize your fellow students to increase the impact and encourage a boycott.

Most schools have adopted a policy which obligates them to use material that’s culturally relevant to the student population and forbids differential treatment. Let’s organize on the student level to ensure we notify the school administration when a violation of these policies occur. The existing model for student organizations fail to tackle important issues like these because they are old, outdated and most are infected with some form of Marxist rot. The time has come for White-ethnic American students to form next generation student unions and networks that have the capacity to take important conversations such as these, and bring them forward to be socially acknowledged. We need student networks and resources that focus on undoing the negative social effects caused by the use of Marxist literature and that give us an opportunity to work directly with the school administration towards a solution, and in turn, help them meet their obligation to provide us with a learning environment that’s free of these elements.

That said, it’s also important to challenge denial of identity outside of the education system as well. The best way to challenge denial of identity is through assertion of identity. Show others when you notice denial of identity being used by the media or random literature. Any one of us can take the time to correct someone’s remarks if they use our identity in an inaccurate or inside-out way. Let them know you noticed that they said that. Also, take a few minutes to write a letter directly to the publisher or the media outlet of books or magazines requesting that they use your identity in the correct way moving forward. Create an online database to register books or materials that have this woven into it so people in other locations know to look for it. Bring this to the attention of your local politicians or friends in the legal or academic field and ask if there’s anything they can do. Most importantly, we must not limit this corrective action to America, Let’s encourage this activism in every western society undergoing this type of attack.

We Americans have a freedom and capacity that the rest of the world does not have, Let us use our free media platform as well as freedom of speech to speak out on behalf of others who would be punished or arrested if they attempt to do so. Let us be a voice for our brothers, sisters and their children from Europe to South Africa, Australia and anywhere else they may need us.

Get going now! Assert and reinforce your cultural identity through pride and practice, and feel good about yourself while you do it! This is the identity that your ancestors made for you! This is your birthright!


Identity Shoppers

An identity shopper is eimage1 2xactly what it sounds like, it’s a person who will use other cultural identities they have no ancestral link to, as a type of marxist activism. Before you can understand the motive of the identity shopper, you must first understand the goal of marxists.

If the goal of the marxist is to erase every cultural identity globally, the challenge becomes, how to get every group to surrender their identity. How do you separate them from their unique identifier so they can then be erased? Since no group of people would willingly forfeit their identity, marxists look for ways to take it from them.

Look back a few years at the context your identity was used in, you’ll notice its been changed. Most literature as well as the way you heard your identity used socially always reinforced it as the unique identifier of your ethnicity or heritage. To begin the separation process, the marxists simply reworded literature to change the context your identity gets used in so it’s no longer unique to you.

School books and magazines that once used your identity in a way which reinforced it as your ethnicity or heritage, are slowly replaced with books and magazines that have been reworded to use your identity in a way that separates it from you, imply that it’s not specific to you and that the whole world can use it too.

The success of this separation technique depends on whether or not you can normalize it and get an entire society to switch the way they use their identity from one that is specific to them, to one that is no longer specific to them or their heritage. Once you have separated the identity from the target population, you can then introduce high volumes of outsiders and unrelated populations that will inevitably scramble them away.

With no unique word to call their heritage, lineage or population, they will slowly disappear into a sea of global traffic. Leaving virtually no evidence that they ever existed and no record that this simple, subtle manipulation technique was used to disappear them.

To get this process started, marxists will encourage identity shopping by sending an invitation to outsiders and foreigners encouraging them to start using ethnic and cultural identities which do not belong to them. The same marxists will then surveil the targeted group and apply social pressure, threats or accusations of racism if they resist the destruction of their identity.

While the targeted population is disabled, the outsiders are given a platform and encouraged to use the hijacked identity out of context, as much as possible, with the goal of normalizing it. You will see low-budget media or simple hashtag campaigns that may appear innocent in nature but they’re not, they’re intended to saturate the public and normalize the distortion of identity. Once this is done for a long enough period of time, the marxists have succeeded in taking the identity away from the target population. Left with no unique name for their heritage or ethnicity, their ability to continue as a people has also been taken away.

The identity shopper is a marxist agitator who accepts the invitation to violate the identities of other cultures and heritages. They publicly call themselves the name of someone else’s people with the intention of vandalizing the meaning of someone else identity, and scrambling it away. They’re often given a media platform and encouraged to agitate the target population by treating the hijacked identity in a poor or disrespectful way. Eventually, public arguments with the agitator will erupt and the very people who originated the cultural identity, are now arguing over its meaning, with the people who didn’t.

Reject identity shoppers, do not validate their rhetoric or their marxist agenda. When no longer on stage, you will often catch them revert back to using their real identity (the one they’re highly protective of) and when you catch them, call them out! Ask them why they’re using someone else’s identity if everyone knows it’s not their ethnicity. Find out their real identity and ask them why they’re not using that one instead. Call them an identity shopper, “out them” tell them you know exactly what they’re up to.

Include this topic in mainstream conversations pertaining to cultural matters. Feel confident when asking someone not to use your ethnic or cultural identity out of context. Reiterate that using someone else’s identity is a form of cultural appropriation, it’s destructive and it’s not acceptable. Tell them that you refuse to validate marxist tactics or normalize “identity shopping”. Tell them, if their ancestors didn’t originate that cultural identity, then they shouldn’t be using it.

Remember to reinforce your own cultural identity and make sure it’s used in a way that reinforces it, instead of distorts it. Use it in a way that refers to yourself, your heritage and your ancestry when you speak, or in the literature that you produce and use. Feel confident challenging those, whom undermine or challenge the meaning of your identity.  Be confident when publicly criticizing identity shoppers.